American Benefits Council
Benefits Byte

2015-005

January 9, 2015

The Benefits Byte is the American Benefits Council’s regular e-mail and online newsletter for members only, providing timely reports on legislative, regulatory and judicial developments, along with updates on the Council’s activities in support of employer-sponsored benefit plans.

The Benefits Byte is published by the American Benefits Council, based on staff reports and edited by Jason Hammersla, Council director of communications. Contact information for Council staff related to specific topics can be found at the end of each story.

Click here to read past issues on the Benefits Byte Archive page.

Follow us on Twitter at @BenefitsCouncil

Council Testifies at IRS Hearing on Proposed Hybrid Plan Amendments

In a January 9 hearing, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), along with representatives from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, heard testimony from members of the retirement plan community, including testimony provided on the Council’s behalf, on the proposed transitional amendments for hybrid defined benefit plans to satisfy the market rate of return rules.

Hybrid retirement plans, such as cash balance plans and pension equity plans, are technically defined benefit plans but also contain features that resemble defined contribution plans. The proposed amendments were released by the IRS on September 19, along with the final regulations addressing market rate of return for hybrid plans under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. The proposal is intended to provide transitional guidance for hybrid plans that are not yet in compliance with the final rules (see the September 18 Benefits Byte).

Kent Mason, partner, Davis & Harman LLP, testified on behalf of the Council as well as the Coalition to Preserve the Defined Benefit System. His testimony followed the comments in the Council’s December 18 letter on the proposed amendments (see the December 18, 2014 Benefits Byte), in which we said:

  • Regulations should provide greater flexibility and avoid a single-solution approach.
  • IRS and Treasury should consider permitting noncompliant rates to be capped at the third segment rate (subject to the exceptions noted in our letter) or changed to the third segment rate.
  • Any new approach with respect to pension equity plan (PEP) matters should not be applied retroactively, through either guidance or enforcement.
  • The status of participant-directed plans needs to be resolved before such plans are required to make amendments.
  • The effective date should provide at least a year after final regulations are published for employers to allow for implementation of new regulations.
  • The final regulations included two new restrictive rules related to whipsaw and early retirement subsidies that were never included in any prior or proposed guidance and should be withdrawn (or, at a minimum, proposed in a future set of proposed hybrid plan regulations) to ensure a fair and open process.
  • Employers need guidance and a sufficient transition period for participant-directed plans.

Other witnesses, including Council member Michael Pollack from Towers Watson, also commented on the need for flexibility and for a later effective date, as well as the importance that guidance and enforcement not be applied retroactively. 

For more information, contact Lynn Dudley, senior vice president, global retirement & compensation policy, or Jan Jacobson, senior counsel, retirement policy, at (202) 289-6700.



CORRECTION: Cost of House 40-Hour Work Week Bill $53.2 Billion Over Ten Years

In the January 8 Benefits Byte, we reported on the U.S. House of Representatives approval of The Save American Workers Act (H.R. 30), a measure that would establish 40 hours as the benchmark for “full time” work under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

We erroneously reported that the latest Congressional Budget Office budget score estimated the cost of the bill as $18.1 billion over the next ten years. In fact, the measure will cost $53.2 billion over the next ten years. $18.1 billion is the cost of the bill over the next five years.

We regret the error. For more information, contact Katy Spangler, senior vice president, health policy, at (202) 289-6700.



The American Benefits Council is the national trade association for companies concerned about federal legislation and regulations affecting all aspects of the employee benefits system. The Council's members represent the entire spectrum of the private employee benefits community and either sponsor directly or administer retirement and health plans covering more than 100 million Americans.

Notice: the information contained herein is general in nature. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, consulting, legal or tax advice or opinion provided by the American Benefits Council or any of its employees. As required by the IRS, we inform you that any information contained herein was not intended or written to be used or referred to, and cannot be used or referred to (i) for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) in promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein (and any attachment).